文章摘要
中国内陆地区中青年麻醉科医师临床科研的现状调查
Status investigation of clinical research among middle-young-aged anesthesiologists in the inland regions of China
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2025.06.011
中文关键词: 中青年  麻醉科医师  临床研究  科研动力  培训需求
英文关键词: Middle-young-aged  Anesthesiologists  Clinical research  Research motivation  Training needs
基金项目:北京市医院管理局“登峰计划”(DFL20220203);北京市卫生系统高层次公共卫生人才建设项目(领军人才-03-01)
作者单位E-mail
杜英杰 100730,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科  
吴黎黎 100730,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科  
陈瑞蓉 100730,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科  
于天阔 100730,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科  
李赫 100730,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科  
王古岩 100730,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科 guyanwang2006@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 167
全文下载次数: 31
中文摘要:
      
目的:调查中国内陆地区中青年(25~55岁)麻醉科医师在临床科研领域的实际状况以及面临的挑战,为提升麻醉学科的临床科研水平提供建议。
方法:本研究通过匿名问卷调查,收集中国内陆地区中青年麻醉科医师的个人信息、临床科研现状、科研动力及培训需求等数据。采用Logistic回归分析方法,分析影响中青年麻醉科医师临床科研论文发表的相关因素。
结果:共收集有效问卷801份。有684名(85.39%)中青年麻醉科医师对临床科研表现出积极态度,但科研成果发表率较低,其中474名(59.18%)发表过中文临床研究论文,109名(13.61%)发表过英文临床研究论文。推动科研的主要动力为职称晋升(78.90%)和解决临床问题(67.16%)。中青年麻醉科医师自认为在统计分析(72.19%)、研究设计(69.33%)和课题实施(58.98%)方面存在不足,在统计分析(61.05%)、研究设计(60.30%)和课题选择(59.68%)方面有培训需求。在开展临床研究过程中,中青年麻醉科医师普遍面临科研能力(72.16%)、时间(70.41%)和经费(61.67%)等方面的困难。学位、职称、既往参加临床科研培训以及医师所在地区对中青年麻醉科医师论文发表具有明显影响(P<0.05)。
结论:中国内陆地区中青年麻醉科医师对临床科研具有较高的兴趣,但科研成果发表有限。建议通过强化临床科研能力培训和建立临床科研支持平台等措施,推动麻醉学科的持续发展。
英文摘要:
      
Objective: To investigate the real-world status and challenges of Chinese inland middle-young-aged anesthesiologists (aged 25-55 years) in clinical research field and to provide recommendations for enhancing clinical research standards in anesthesiology.
Methods: A national anonymous online survey was conducted to collect data on Chinese inland middle-young-aged anesthesiologists' personal information, clinical research status, research motivation, and training needs. Logistic regression analyses was used to examine factors influencing clinical research publication among middle-young-aged anesthesiologists.
Results: A total of 801 valid questionnaires were collected. A total of 684 (85.39%) middle-young-aged anesthesiologists showed a positive attitude toward clinical research, but the publication rate of research findings was low, with 474 (59.18%) middle-young-aged anesthesiologists having published Chinese articles and 109 (13.61%) middle-young-aged anesthesiologists having published English articles. The primary motivators for research were professional title advancement (78.90%) and clinical problem-solving (67.16%). Most moddle-young-aged anesthesilogists reported deficiencies in statistical analysis (72.19%), research design (69.33%), and project implementation (58.98%), and indicated a lack of training in statistical analysis (61.05%), research design (60.30%), and project selection (59.68%), respectively. In conducting clinical research, middle-young-aged anesthesiologists commonly faced challenges related to research capabilities (72.16%), time constraints (70.41%), and funding limitations (61.67%). Academic qualifications, professional titles, previous participation in clinical research training, and the region where the anesthesiologist is located, have a significant impact on the clinical research publication of middle-young-aged anesthesiologists (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Middle-young-aged anesthesiologists in the inland regions of China show strong interest in clinical research but have limited research output. Recommendations include strengthening clinical research training, and establishing clinical research support platforms to foster sustainable development in the field of anesthesiology.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭